Search Results

Case

ACLU Foundation of Northern California Calls on UC Berkeley to Respect Constitutional Rights in Student Disciplinary Process

Apr 06, 2010
On April 6, 2010, the ACLU Foundation of Northern California sent a letter to U.C. Berkeley, criticizing its handling of discipline against students involved in on-campus protests on December 11, 2009.Students were issued overbroad suspensions that limited even their off-campus communications with members of the University community, in violation of the rights to free association and speech, and t... Read More
ACLU of Northern CA
News

ACLU, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights File Court Papers Against Proposed Oakland Gang Injunction

Apr 08, 2010
On April 8, 2010, the ACLU of Northern California and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area filed an amicus brief with the Alameda County Superior Court opposing a proposed gang injunction in Oakland. If granted, the gang injunction would give the Oakland Police Department wide discretion to label people gang members without having to present any evidence to a judge... Read More
ACLU of Northern CA
Blog

Facebook's Change - Make Your Voice Heard!

Apr 08, 2010
In a blog post Monday evening, Facebook stated that it would be moving ahead with the privacy policy changes it proposed on March 26th without any suggestion that it will make any changes to those proposals, despite extensive criticism of the proposals and a recent web poll showing that 95% of respondents think that the changes are a bad idea.Facebook's proposed changes affect user privacy in many... Read More
ACLU of Northern CA
Blog

The New York Times Demands dotRights - You Should Too!

Apr 09, 2010
The ACLU has recently been making a lot of noise about modernizing the laws that protect our online privacy. We believe that law enforcement should have to go to a judge and get a warrant that says it has probable cause to believe you've committed a crime before it can read your email, browse through your social networking account, or track your location. Right now, that's not the case. Digital in... Read More
ACLU of Northern CA
Blog

Google's New Transparency Tool: A Window Into Government Surveillance

Apr 20, 2010
We've known for a long time that electronic privacy law is woefully outdated. But what we haven't known is how often the government is taking advantage of this fact to engage in a shopping spree in the treasure trove of personal information being collected by companies like Google.So we're happy to see Google's just-released Government Requests tool, which is the company's attempt to shine some li... Read More
ACLU of Northern CA
Blog

Google Announces New Tool To Track Information Requests From Governments

Apr 20, 2010
Washington – The American Civil Liberties Union today welcomed a new tool launched by Google to track and display the number of government requests the company receives worldwide, country by country. The Government Request Transparency Tool differentiates between requests for removal of particular content and requests for private user data. According to the company, there is no way yet to distingu... Read More
ACLU of Northern CA
Blog

Is Facebook Having Another Privacy Disconnect?

Apr 21, 2010

The very first sentence on Facebook's privacy guide page states: "You should have control over what you share."

That seems fairly simple, doesn't it?

But many of Facebook's recent actions, such as its much-criticized "privacy transition," have made it harder for users to retain control over their information. Is this week more of the same?

Earlier this week, following up on its , Facebook announced its plans to create more dynamic profiles using "Connections." What exactly counts as a connection wasn't clearly defined either time, but seems to include things like friends lists, likes and interests, events, groups, and activities. (Today's announcement of the Social Graph API includes News Feed, Wall, Notes, Photos, and Videos as "connections" too, but Facebook may be overusing the word to mean different things.)

More importantly, it also isn't clear whether users will have real control over how their connections are shared. Both Facebook's Monday announcement and its have suggested that users cannot prevent applications, pages, and other third parties from accessing these connections. (They may be able to "hide" them from other Facebook users, but not from the government, advertisers, or anyone else with the ability and incentive to create apps or pages.) However, today's new documents for developers point to the Extended Permissions page that requires that applications and pages to explicitly ask the user before accessing various "connections," including interests, events, groups, and location.

If Facebook believes that you "should have control over what you share," it should resolve this by giving users real control over whether their connections can be accessed by apps and pages. Doing so still won't resolve other issues, like the "app gap" that allows your friends' applications to view your personal information without your knowledge or consent, but it would be one step in the right direction.

Otherwise, the only way you can keep control of your information is to refuse to use Facebook to share or connect at all. And that's not what we mean by control.

So don't let Facebook take away control over your personal information! Tell Facebook that you want to have control over your friends, groups, events, and interests so that you – and not Facebook, the government, or anyone else – chooses how and when they are shared!

Demand control of your personal information – Demand Your dotRights!

Chris Conley is the Technology and Civil Liberties Fellow with the ACLU of Northern California.

Read More
ACLU of Northern CA
Blog

Statistical Evidence That We Need a Privacy Law Upgrade

Apr 23, 2010
Two surveys caught our eye today. The surveys are on two different Internet privacy topics–location information and cloud computing–but both reveal how important it is that we reform electronic privacy law to clearly cover useful digital services. Updating electronic privacy law is necessary both to protect the users of these services and for the businesses who hope to encourage Americans that the... Read More